Moving to Clean Vehicles Advances Environmental Justice and Equity

Legislation to require that, starting with a certain model-year (such as 2040), all new vehicles sold would have to be clean vehicles rather than gasoline vehicles (“Clean Cars Legislation”), would deliver landmark advances in environmental justice and equity to communities of color in five important areas—health, fuel expenses, land values, economic opportunity, and community self-determination

1.       Improved Health

In Southern California alone, 1.2 million people live within 500 feet of a freeway.   Communities of color are much more likely to live very near these freeways and are therefore disproportionately affected by vehicle exhaust coming from cars on freeways and other heavily trafficked roads.   

180520 la freeways and housing.png

 

Residential neighborhoods bordered by freeways in East Los Angeles

Numerous studies endorsed by the USC Environmental Health Centers conclude that babies and children living near busy roads are more likely to suffer from low birth weight, behavioral and learning deficits, and asthma, and that adults living near freeways have higher rates of lung and cardiovascular disease.  Other recent studies link cancers of the nervous system in children to proximity to major roadways.   

Vehicle-related health impacts negatively affect quality of life, life opportunities, and finances of people of color.  Children struggling with pollution-induced mental or behavioral deficits or asthma are much more likely to miss and/or fall behind in school.   Adults suffering from cardiovascular disease have decreased quality of life and earning potential, and higher medical expenses.  Low-income families often have to pay out-of-pocket for a portion of the medical treatment they receive, and take time off from work to take their children to the doctor.  

Clean Cars Legislation, by eliminating virtually all gas cars on the road, would help millions of people who live near roadways breathe cleaner air, and avoid the significant health, educational, financial, and quality-of-life losses caused by gas car emissions.

 

2.       Lower Fuel and Transportation Costs

Electricity costs considerably less than gasoline on a per-mile-traveled basis.   People in the bottom 20% of income pay 5.6% of their income on gasoline, compared to 1.5% for people in the top 20%, and thus the fuel savings that come from vehicle electrification would disproportionately benefit lower income persons.

Clean Cars Legislation would dramatically increase the number of electric cars on the road, which would in turn cause large numbers of used electric cars to enter the market.   Given that the sticker prices of new electric cars are projected to be the same as those of gas cars by 2025,  electric cars will soon be more affordable at time of purchase than their gas counterparts, and much less expensive to operate.

 

3.       Property Values

Numerous studies have documented that properties abutting freeways have considerably lower property values than properties further away.  The air and noise pollution from freeways is considered a primary driver of lower values.  Because phasing out of gasoline cars would result in considerable reductions in air and noise pollution, the value of properties near freeways would be likely to go up as a result of Clean Cars Legislation, thereby economically benefiting those homeowners.

 

4.       Development of Electric Charging Stations Offers Enormous Economic Opportunity

Few new gas stations are being built today, and therefore generate minimal new economic opportunity.   Other than convenience store workers, gas stations don’t provide many jobs.

The switch from gasoline to electric would create enormous economic opportunities around the installation and service of vast numbers of new home charging, destination, and fast-charging stations required to serve electric vehicles.   Billions of dollars of new capital would go to building out the charging infrastructure.  Minority-owned small business, fueled by financing mechanisms such as the Empower California Act, A.B. 865, would be well-positioned to capitalize on charging installation and operation.

 

5.       Local Control over Electrical Power and Automotive Fuel Expenditures

Gasoline typically comes from distant refineries and oil wells, and communities have no influence over gasoline’s cost.  Everyone, rich and poor, pays essentially the same price for gasoline.

Electricity, in contrast, can be generated anywhere the sun shines, and is already subject to considerable local and community control.  In many parts of California, Community Choice Aggregations select the generation source for the community’s electricity.  In areas served by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), low-income persons pay less for electricity, and their interests in lower electricity prices are given great weight by the California Public Utility Commission.  There are numerous grant and incentive programs to support the installation of solar panels in low-income communities which will allow people to fuel their cars at little or no cost. 

Because communities of color have some control over the generation, distribution, and pricing of electrical power, vehicle electrification would significantly enhance local control of energy sources and enable communities to retain a much larger share of their fuel dollars.

Furthermore, by transitioning to electric power, communities of color would no longer be financing the oil companies, which have historically financed politicians dedicated to policies which diminish the rights of communities of color and increase income inequality.

Gasoline was never the friend of communities of color, and its dominance as a transportation fuel has had severe adverse effects on the health, wealth, and politics of those communities.  Clean Cars Legislation would spell the end of the gasoline era, and lead to positive transformations for communities of color in California and across the nation.